Treffer: Bayesian estimation of doxorubicin pharmacokinetic parameters.
Original Publication: Berlin, New York, Springer International.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990;27(3):219-25. (PMID: 2265458)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985 Oct;13(5):515-40. (PMID: 3834066)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981 Oct;9(5):635-51. (PMID: 7334463)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985 Feb;13(1):101-15. (PMID: 3839529)
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1985 Aug;21(8):893-5. (PMID: 2995044)
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989 Apr;45(4):340-7. (PMID: 2702792)
Cancer Res. 1983 Jul;43(7):3417-21. (PMID: 6850648)
Br J Cancer. 1989 Jul;60(1):89-92. (PMID: 2803920)
J Pharm Sci. 1989 Sep;78(9):753-7. (PMID: 2585270)
Ann Intern Med. 1975 May;82(5):619-27. (PMID: 1137256)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985 Apr;13(2):185-201. (PMID: 4057057)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981 Apr;9(2):131-46. (PMID: 7277205)
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;28(2):205-12. (PMID: 3987800)
J Clin Oncol. 1988 Aug;6(8):1321-7. (PMID: 3411343)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981 Aug;9(4):503-12. (PMID: 7310648)
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Feb;96(2):133-9. (PMID: 7059060)
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988 May;14(5):311-20. (PMID: 3396259)
Comput Biomed Res. 1972 Oct;5(5):411-59. (PMID: 4634367)
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1988 Dec 9;10(6):237-45. (PMID: 3062572)
Cancer Res. 1987 Apr 1;47(7):1780-4. (PMID: 3028613)
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1983 Oct;11(5):547-59. (PMID: 6668559)
N Engl J Med. 1984 May 24;310(21):1353-6. (PMID: 6546971)
Br J Cancer. 1980 Jun;41(6):886-91. (PMID: 7426313)
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988 Jul;15(1):15-31. (PMID: 3042244)
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1982 Aug;18(8):739-45. (PMID: 6891324)
Cancer Treat Rep. 1982 May;66(5):1159-68. (PMID: 7083218)
Weitere Informationen
Doxorubicin was given by brief i.v. infusion (doses ranging from 25 to 72 mg/m2) to 28 patients for 2-7 successive courses of chemotherapy (68 courses studied in all). A Bayesian approach was developed to determine the individual pharmacokinetic parameters of doxorubicin. Statistical characteristics of the population pharmacokinetic parameters were first evaluated for 19 patients and a total of 30 courses, which, when combined with 4 individual plasma concentrations of drug, led to a Bayesian estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters for the remaining 38 courses. The estimated parameters for the elimination phase (A3/V1 and t1/2 elimination) and the residual plasma level at 48 h as computed by Bayesian estimation on this reduced sub-optimal sampling protocol were compared with a maximal likelihood estimation of these parameters. No statistically significant differences were found. Performance of the developed methodology was evaluated by computing bias and precision. The mean errors were -0.0315 x 10(-4) l-1 for A3/V1, 0.0839 h for t1/2 elimination, and -0.22 ng/ml for c(48 h). The precision of the prediction of these three parameters (0.304 x 10(-5) l-1, 3.34 h, and 0.659 ng/ml, respectively) remained lower than the interindividual standard deviation (1.42 x 10(-4) l-1, 14.9 h, and 4.54 ng/ml, respectively). This procedure enables the estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters for doxorubicin at minimal cost and minimal disturbance of the patient.