Treffer: On validation and invalidation of biological models.

Title:
On validation and invalidation of biological models.
Authors:
Anderson J; Doctoral Training Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. james.anderson@dtc.ox.ac.uk, Papachristodoulou A
Source:
BMC bioinformatics [BMC Bioinformatics] 2009 May 07; Vol. 10, pp. 132. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 May 07.
Publication Type:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100965194 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2105 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712105 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Bioinformatics Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2000-
References:
BMC Syst Biol. 2009 Feb 23;3:25. (PMID: 19236711)
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun 20;6:155. (PMID: 15967022)
Genome Res. 2004 Sep;14(9):1773-85. (PMID: 15342560)
Theor Biol Med Model. 2006 Jan 27;3:4. (PMID: 16441881)
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 15;8:12. (PMID: 17224043)
PLoS Biol. 2004 Jun;2(6):e164. (PMID: 15208717)
Biophys J. 2004 Mar;86(3):1270-81. (PMID: 14990460)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20090509 Date Completed: 20090914 Latest Revision: 20211020
Update Code:
20250114
PubMed Central ID:
PMC2704209
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2105-10-132
PMID:
19422679
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Background: Very frequently the same biological system is described by several, sometimes competing mathematical models. This usually creates confusion around their validity, ie, which one is correct. However, this is unnecessary since validity of a model cannot be established; model validation is actually a misnomer. In principle the only statement that one can make about a system model is that it is incorrect, ie, invalid, a fact which can be established given appropriate experimental data. Nonlinear models of high dimension and with many parameters are impossible to invalidate through simulation and as such the invalidation process is often overlooked or ignored.
Results: We develop different approaches for showing how competing ordinary differential equation (ODE) based models of the same biological phenomenon containing nonlinearities and parametric uncertainty can be invalidated using experimental data. We first emphasize the strong interplay between system identification and model invalidation and we describe a method for obtaining a lower bound on the error between candidate model predictions and data. We then turn to model invalidation and formulate a methodology for discrete-time and continuous-time model invalidation. The methodology is algorithmic and uses Semidefinite Programming as the computational tool. It is emphasized that trying to invalidate complex nonlinear models through exhaustive simulation is not only computationally intractable but also inconclusive.
Conclusion: Biological models derived from experimental data can never be validated. In fact, in order to understand biological function one should try to invalidate models that are incompatible with available data. This work describes a framework for invalidating both continuous and discrete-time ODE models based on convex optimization techniques. The methodology does not require any simulation of the candidate models; the algorithms presented in this paper have a worst case polynomial time complexity and can provide an exact answer to the invalidation problem.