Treffer: Real-world comparison of CPU and GPU implementations of SNPrank: a network analysis tool for GWAS.
PLoS Genet. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000432. (PMID: 19300503)
Genes Immun. 2010 Dec;11(8):630-6. (PMID: 20613780)
Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):661-78. (PMID: 17554300)
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75. (PMID: 17701901)
Weitere Informationen
Motivation: Bioinformatics researchers have a variety of programming languages and architectures at their disposal, and recent advances in graphics processing unit (GPU) computing have added a promising new option. However, many performance comparisons inflate the actual advantages of GPU technology. In this study, we carry out a realistic performance evaluation of SNPrank, a network centrality algorithm that ranks single nucleotide polymorhisms (SNPs) based on their importance in the context of a phenotype-specific interaction network. Our goal is to identify the best computational engine for the SNPrank web application and to provide a variety of well-tested implementations of SNPrank for Bioinformaticists to integrate into their research.
Results: Using SNP data from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium genome-wide association study of Bipolar Disorder, we compare multiple SNPrank implementations, including Python, Matlab and Java as well as CPU versus GPU implementations. When compared with naïve, single-threaded CPU implementations, the GPU yields a large improvement in the execution time. However, with comparable effort, multi-threaded CPU implementations negate the apparent advantage of GPU implementations.
Availability: The SNPrank code is open source and available at http://insilico.utulsa.edu/snprank.