Serviceeinschränkungen vom 12.-22.02.2026 - weitere Infos auf der UB-Homepage

Treffer: A Multilevel AR(1) Model: Allowing for Inter-Individual Differences in Trait-Scores, Inertia, and Innovation Variance.

Title:
A Multilevel AR(1) Model: Allowing for Inter-Individual Differences in Trait-Scores, Inertia, and Innovation Variance.
Authors:
Jongerling J; a Department of Methodology and Statistics , Utrecht University., Laurenceau JP; b Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , University of Delaware., Hamaker EL; a Department of Methodology and Statistics , Utrecht University.
Source:
Multivariate behavioral research [Multivariate Behav Res] 2015; Vol. 50 (3), pp. 334-49.
Publication Type:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0046052 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-7906 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00273171 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Multivariate Behav Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: <2009- > : Philadelphia, PA : Taylor & Francis Group
Original Publication: Fort Worth, Tex. : Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology
Grant Information:
K01 MH064779 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20151127 Date Completed: 20161111 Latest Revision: 20241113
Update Code:
20250114
DOI:
10.1080/00273171.2014.1003772
PMID:
26610033
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

In this article we consider a multilevel first-order autoregressive [AR(1)] model with random intercepts, random autoregression, and random innovation variance (i.e., the level 1 residual variance). Including random innovation variance is an important extension of the multilevel AR(1) model for two reasons. First, between-person differences in innovation variance are important from a substantive point of view, in that they capture differences in sensitivity and/or exposure to unmeasured internal and external factors that influence the process. Second, using simulation methods we show that modeling the innovation variance as fixed across individuals, when it should be modeled as a random effect, leads to biased parameter estimates. Additionally, we use simulation methods to compare maximum likelihood estimation to Bayesian estimation of the multilevel AR(1) model and investigate the trade-off between the number of individuals and the number of time points. We provide an empirical illustration by applying the extended multilevel AR(1) model to daily positive affect ratings from 89 married women over the course of 42 consecutive days.