Treffer: The role of valence in word processing: Evidence from lexical decision and emotional Stroop tasks.

Title:
The role of valence in word processing: Evidence from lexical decision and emotional Stroop tasks.
Authors:
Crossfield E; University of Bristol, United Kingdom., Damian MF; University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.damian@bristol.ac.uk.
Source:
Acta psychologica [Acta Psychol (Amst)] 2021 Jul; Vol. 218, pp. 103359. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 29.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: North Holland Publishing Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 0370366 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-6297 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00016918 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Acta Psychol (Amst) Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Amsterdam : North Holland Publishing
Original Publication: The Hague.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Emotional Stroop; Lexical decision; Mouse tracking; Valence; Visual word processing
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210701 Date Completed: 20210721 Latest Revision: 20210721
Update Code:
20250114
DOI:
10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103359
PMID:
34198169
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

It is widely accepted that the valence of a word (neutral, positive, or negative) influences lexical processing, yet data from the commonly used lexical decision and emotional Stroop tasks has yielded inconsistent findings regarding the direction of this influence. One critical obstacle to investigating the independent effects of valence is the matching of emotional and neutral stimuli on the lexical, sublexical, and conceptual characteristics known to influence word recognition. The second obstacle is that the cognitive processes which lead to a lexical decision and a colour naming response are unobservable from the response latency measures typically gathered. The present study compiled a set of neutral, positive, and negative words matched triplet-wise on 26 influential characteristics. The novel "mouse tracking" technique was used to analyse the development of responses to these materials in variants of the lexical decision and emotional Stroop task. A conventional key-press emotional Stroop task is also reported. Results revealed a significant processing advantage for positive words over negative and neutral words in the lexical decision task, whereas valence alone did not produce any significant effects in the emotional Stroop task. The discrepancy between the effects of valence across these different tasks is discussed. We also suggest that previous conflicting findings may be confounded by unmatched emotional and neutral stimuli, thus inflating the potential effects of valence.
(Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)