Result: Data sharing in neurodegenerative disease research: challenges and learnings from the innovative medicines initiative public-private partnership model.
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 30;13:1031091. (PMID: 36530625)
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Apr;1313:17-34. (PMID: 24673372)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):858-864. (PMID: 29666310)
Sci Data. 2016 Jun 21;3:160044. (PMID: 27326542)
SLAS Discov. 2021 Jun;26(5):604-619. (PMID: 33586501)
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 16;14:1140722. (PMID: 37006486)
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):3-13. (PMID: 31719155)
BMJ. 2018 Feb 13;360:k400. (PMID: 29440066)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 May;42(7):1945-1951. (PMID: 33522661)
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 02;13:994301. (PMID: 36408524)
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 22;13:1050360. (PMID: 36484019)
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229003. (PMID: 32160189)
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 20;13:1063598. (PMID: 36761917)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):283. (PMID: 31888593)
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Jul 03;6(4):37. (PMID: 25024750)
Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018. (PMID: 26978244)
PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 02;13(10):e1002264. (PMID: 26431313)
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):384-6. (PMID: 26786954)
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e105-e125. (PMID: 34998485)
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Jun;22(6):723-729. (PMID: 28513210)
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 May;16(5):750-758. (PMID: 32281303)
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Mar;25(1):23-30. (PMID: 34787769)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:33-41. (PMID: 35654271)
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 May 04;8(1):e12295. (PMID: 35516416)
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033972. (PMID: 33507256)
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 22;13:1051543. (PMID: 36484017)
Neuron. 2022 Feb 16;110(4):600-612. (PMID: 34914921)
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Jul;131:104096. (PMID: 35643273)
Further Information
Efficient data sharing is hampered by an array of organizational, ethical, behavioral, and technical challenges, slowing research progress and reducing the utility of data generated by clinical research studies on neurodegenerative diseases. There is a particular need to address differences between public and private sector environments for research and data sharing, which have varying standards, expectations, motivations, and interests. The Neuronet data sharing Working Group was set up to understand the existing barriers to data sharing in public-private partnership projects, and to provide guidance to overcome these barriers, by convening data sharing experts from diverse projects in the IMI neurodegeneration portfolio. In this policy and practice review, we outline the challenges and learnings of the WG, providing the neurodegeneration community with examples of good practices and recommendations on how to overcome obstacles to data sharing. These obstacles span organizational issues linked to the unique structure of cross-sectoral, collaborative research initiatives, to technical issues that affect the storage, structure and annotations of individual datasets. We also identify sociotechnical hurdles, such as academic recognition and reward systems that disincentivise data sharing, and legal challenges linked to heightened perceptions of data privacy risk, compounded by a lack of clear guidance on GDPR compliance mechanisms for public-private research. Focusing on real-world, neuroimaging and digital biomarker data, we highlight particular challenges and learnings for data sharing, such as data management planning, development of ethical codes of conduct, and harmonization of protocols and curation processes. Cross-cutting solutions and enablers include the principles of transparency, standardization and co-design - from open, accessible metadata catalogs that enhance findability of data, to measures that increase visibility and trust in data reuse.
(Copyright © 2023 Bradshaw, Hughes, Vallez-Garcia, Chokoshvili, Owens, Hansen, Emmert, Maetzler, Killin, Barnes, Brookes, Visser, Hofmann-Apitius, Diaz and Steukers.)
NH is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson, but no product-related aspects. LS is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV. RB was employed by Aridhia Informatics Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.