Treffer: [Preliminary Study on the Identification of Aerobic Vaginitis by Artificial Intelligence Analysis System].
Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):1012-1021. (PMID: 31142849)
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2018 Jan-Feb;15(1):41-51. (PMID: 29275361)
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Nov;21(6):1633-1643. (PMID: 28541229)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 24;22(1):432. (PMID: 35610632)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Apr;285(4):1013-8. (PMID: 21938501)
Technol Health Care. 2021;29(2):407-417. (PMID: 33386836)
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;35(8):1297-303. (PMID: 27180245)
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;55(1):40-4. (PMID: 26927246)
Radiol Phys Technol. 2020 Mar;13(1):6-19. (PMID: 31898014)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 09;11(1):. (PMID: 33435407)
Acta Cytol. 2019;63(5):391-400. (PMID: 31216550)
J Oral Pathol Med. 2020 Oct;49(9):849-856. (PMID: 32449232)
Int J STD AIDS. 2018 Nov;29(13):1258-1272. (PMID: 30049258)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):324-335. (PMID: 30447213)
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 09;8(12):. (PMID: 33316918)
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 09;11:677648. (PMID: 34568084)
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Dec 04;12:3745-3754. (PMID: 31824176)
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;96(4):114981. (PMID: 31955954)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Feb;287(2):329-35. (PMID: 23015152)
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan 18;2020:5842150. (PMID: 32395067)
Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 28;19(1):21. (PMID: 35090514)
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;38(2):233-239. (PMID: 30467614)
Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 26;6:78. (PMID: 29632854)
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 25;56(1):11-14. (PMID: 33486922)
Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 30;10:2451. (PMID: 31736898)
Res Microbiol. 2017 Nov - Dec;168(9-10):845-858. (PMID: 28502874)
Int J STD AIDS. 2020 Oct;31(11):1018-1027. (PMID: 32842907)
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54(9):4-8. (PMID: 26863788)
J Microsc. 2017 Sep;267(3):299-308. (PMID: 28419509)
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 8;42(11):226. (PMID: 30298337)
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Dec;50(4):477-487. (PMID: 31601480)
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;35(4):657-64. (PMID: 26810061)
Weitere Informationen
Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence vaginal secretion analysis system based on deep learning and to evaluate the accuracy of automated microscopy in the clinical diagnosis of aerobic vaginitis (AV).
Methods: In this study, the vaginal secretion samples of 3769 patients receiving treatment at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University between January 2020 and December 2021 were selected. Using the results of manual microscopy as the control, we developed the linear kernel SVM algorithm, an artificial intelligence (AI) automated analysis software, with Python Scikit-learn script. The AI automated analysis software could identify leucocytes with toxic appearance and parabasal epitheliocytes (PBC). The bacterial grading parameters were reset using standard strains of lactobacillus and AV common isolates. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off value of AV evaluation results for different scoring items were obtained by using the results of manual microscopy as the control. Then, the parameters of automatic AV identification were determined and the automatic AV analysis scoring method was initially established.
Results: A total of 3769 vaginal secretion samples were collected. The AI automated analysis system incorporated five parameters and each parameter incorporated three severity scoring levels. We selected 1.5 μm as the cut-off value for the diameter between Lactobacillus and common AV bacterial isolates. The automated identification parameter of Lactobacillus was the ratio of bacteria ≥1.5 μm to those <1.5 μm. The cut-off scores were 2.5 and 0.5, In the parameter of white blood cells (WBC), the cut-off value of the absolute number of WBC was 10 <sup>3</sup> μL <sup>-1</sup> and the cut-off value of WBC-to-epithelial cell ratio was 10. The automated identification parameter of toxic WBC was the ratio of toxic WBC toWBC and the cut-off values were 1% and 15%. The parameter of background flora was bacteria<1.5 μm and the cut-off values were 5×10 <sup>3</sup> μL <sup>-1</sup> and 3×10 <sup>4</sup> μL <sup>-1</sup> . The parameter of the parabasal epitheliocytes was the ratio of PBC to epithelial cells and the cut-off values were 1% and 10%. The agreement rate between the results of automated microscopy and those of manual microscopy was 92.5%. Out of 200 samples, automated microscopy and manual microscopy produced consistent scores for 185 samples, while the results for 15 samples were inconsistent.
Conclusion: We developed an AI recognition software for AV and established an automated vaginal secretion microscopy scoring system for AV. There was good overall concordance between automated microscopy and manual microscopy. The AI identification software for AV can complete clinical lab examination with rather high objectivity, sensitivity, and efficiency, markedly reducing the workload of manual microscopy.
(© 2024《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有Copyright ©2024 Editorial Board of Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences).)
利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突