Treffer: The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature-a selective overview.
Original Publication: Baltimore, School of Hygiene and Public Health of Johns Hopkins Univ.
Prev Med. 2014 May;62:96-102. (PMID: 24525165)
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;185(11):1048-1050. (PMID: 28535177)
Epidemiology. 1999 Jan;10(1):37-48. (PMID: 9888278)
Epidemiology. 2004 Sep;15(5):615-25. (PMID: 15308962)
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1216-1227. (PMID: 37106081)
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 12;11(1):5749. (PMID: 33184277)
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):417-20. (PMID: 19926667)
Epidemiology. 2001 May;12(3):313-20. (PMID: 11338312)
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):226-235. (PMID: 29040562)
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):982-984. (PMID: 33226690)
Epidemiology. 2023 Nov 1;34(6):865-872. (PMID: 37708480)
Epidemiology. 2022 Sep 1;33(5):699-706. (PMID: 35700187)
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 5;193(3):407-409. (PMID: 37939152)
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):e23-9. (PMID: 24309675)
Epidemiology. 2023 Mar 1;34(2):186-191. (PMID: 36722800)
Epidemiology. 2018 May;29(3):e20-e21. (PMID: 29319631)
Epidemiology. 2018 Jul;29(4):521-524. (PMID: 29746369)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;34(10):927-938. (PMID: 31451995)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;(4):MR000012. (PMID: 21491415)
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 19;191(12):2063-2070. (PMID: 35774001)
Epidemiology. 2012 Jan;23(1):159-64. (PMID: 22081062)
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Jan 15;155(2):176-84. (PMID: 11790682)
Epidemiology. 2003 May;14(3):300-6. (PMID: 12859030)
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):91-7. (PMID: 26484424)
Annu Rev Sociol. 2014 Jul;40:31-53. (PMID: 30111904)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):407-416. (PMID: 29415329)
JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):278-85. (PMID: 17227979)
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1714-1722. (PMID: 29982600)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;44(1):345-54. (PMID: 25604449)
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):267-277. (PMID: 38904459)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;63(2):136-8. (PMID: 20122500)
Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Sep;106(3):184-7. (PMID: 900117)
Weitere Informationen
Selection bias has long been central in methodological discussions across epidemiology and other fields. In epidemiology, the concept of selection bias has been continually evolving over time. In this issue of American Journal of Epidemiology, Mathur and Shpitser (Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194(1):267-277) present simple graphical rules for assessing the presence of selection bias when estimating causal effects by using a single-world intervention graph (SWIG). Their work is particularly insightful as it addresses the scenarios where treatment affects sample selection-a topic that has been underexplored in previous literature on selection bias. To contextualize the work by Mathur and Shpitser, we trace the evolution of the concept of selection bias in epidemiology, focusing primarily on the developments in the last 20-30 years following the adoption of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in epidemiologic research.
(© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)