Treffer: Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with R0 resection of soft tissue sarcoma: results from the European sarcoma CONTICABASE analysis.
Original Publication: London, British Institute of Radiology.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Aug 1;48(1):227-32. (PMID: 10924993)
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Apr;12(4):353-60. (PMID: 21454129)
Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):506-11. (PMID: 20130465)
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):429-435. (PMID: 32723608)
Acta Orthop. 2017 Jun;88(3):341-347. (PMID: 28266233)
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;44(12):624-628. (PMID: 34753882)
Br J Surg. 2010 May;97(5):707-13. (PMID: 20235085)
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Oct;17(10):3252-9. (PMID: 10506627)
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr;75(1):48-53. (PMID: 15948265)
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2802-2820. (PMID: 28493287)
Ann Surg. 2012 Feb;255(2):343-7. (PMID: 22143203)
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):197-203. (PMID: 9440743)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1536-1543. (PMID: 29470819)
Oncologist. 2016 Oct;21(10):1269-1276. (PMID: 27440063)
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:313-323. (PMID: 28797949)
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):567-75. (PMID: 12192016)
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;32(29):3236-41. (PMID: 25185087)
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):675-81; discussion 681-2. (PMID: 17893504)
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 01;28(11):2852-2859. (PMID: 29117335)
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):1119-24. (PMID: 19362782)
Cancer. 2014 Sep 15;120(18):2866-75. (PMID: 24894656)
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;113(1):108-13. (PMID: 26661586)
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):704-709. (PMID: 29346043)
Clin Sarcoma Res. 2016 Nov 15;6:20. (PMID: 27891213)
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jul 15;71(4):1196-203. (PMID: 18207661)
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv51-iv67. (PMID: 29846498)
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1643-50. (PMID: 11896115)
Cancer Med. 2018 Sep;7(9):4228-4239. (PMID: 30030882)
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 May;23(5):922-930. (PMID: 33405052)
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep-Oct;11(5):339-351. (PMID: 34326023)
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;38(19):2178-2186. (PMID: 32421444)
Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1854-1860. (PMID: 24914041)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2484-9. (PMID: 24756814)
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Nov;34(12):1876-82. (PMID: 10023309)
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):859-68. (PMID: 8622034)
Sarcoma. 2021 Oct 21;2021:8851354. (PMID: 34720664)
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;112(4):338-43. (PMID: 26250782)
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;41(4):348-356. (PMID: 26886948)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2463-5. (PMID: 24838365)
Ann Oncol. 2021 Nov;32(11):1348-1365. (PMID: 34303806)
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020 May 27;21(7):56. (PMID: 32462511)
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jul 1;19(13):3203-9. (PMID: 11432887)
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jun;78:1-6. (PMID: 28391003)
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):230-4. (PMID: 16442951)
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Sep;39(13):1872-80. (PMID: 12932665)
Weitere Informationen
Objectives: We aim to report the outcomes of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients with surgical R0 margin size (large: ≥5 mm or close: ≥1 to <5 mm) tumour, treated or not with postoperative radiotherapy (RT).
Methods: The Connective Tissue Cancer Network database CONTICABASE collected data from adult patients diagnosed from 1999 to 2016 for histologically-proven locally advanced STS of trunk or limbs, with surgical R0 margin size (large: ≥5 mm; close: ≥1 to <5 mm), who did not receive neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to account for potential treatment selection biases. We reported local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), RT impact in subgroup analyses, and performed multivariable analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors.
Results: Among 738 patients with STS eligible from 11 sites, 524 patients had R0 surgical margins, either treated with postoperative RT (N = 374, 71.4%), or not (N = 150). Besides similar characteristics regarding sex, age, margin size, and preoperative MRI assessment, more tumour localizations in lower limbs (62.8% vs 46%), larger tumours (≥5 cm) (68.4% vs 46%), deeper tumours (75.9% vs 56%), and more grade ≥3 tumours (50.4% vs 32.7%) were reported in patients having received adjuvant RT. The median follow-up was 74.7 [95% CI 71.8-83.0] months, 10-year-LC, -DFS, and -OS were 77.5% [95% CI 71.2-82.6], 51.0% [45.1-56.7], and 69.6% [63.7-74.6], respectively. The multivariable analysis showed that patients with older age and larger tumours are more at risk in terms of LC, DFS, and OS. Preoperative MRI assessment (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.83; P = .012) and RT (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.49; P < .001) were significantly associated with better LC. However, RT did not impact OS. Subgroup analyses showed that RT also benefit to grade 1 and 2 tumours.
Conclusion: This series shows that adjuvant RT improved LC in all patients with STS with surgical R0 resection.
Advances in Knowledge: This series did not identify subgroups in whom RT can be deleted.
(© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology.)