Serviceeinschränkungen vom 12.-22.02.2026 - weitere Infos auf der UB-Homepage

Treffer: A journal use study: checkouts and in-house use.

Title:
A journal use study: checkouts and in-house use.
Authors:
Walter PL; Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, University of California, Los Angeles 90095, USA.
Source:
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association [Bull Med Libr Assoc] 1996 Oct; Vol. 84 (4), pp. 461-7.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Medical Library Assn Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0421037 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0025-7338 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00257338 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Bull Med Libr Assoc Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Chicago [etc.] Medical Library Assn.
References:
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1970 Jan;58(1):65-7. (PMID: 5411707)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1974 Jan;62(1):37-48. (PMID: 4812590)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1975 Oct;63(4):366-77. (PMID: 1191822)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Jan;65(1):58-61. (PMID: 831886)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Apr;65(2):297-9. (PMID: 843662)
Libr J. 1990 Mar 1;115(4):59-60. (PMID: 10104018)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1981 Oct;69(4):387-91. (PMID: 7296121)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Mar 15;190(6):623-6. (PMID: 3570915)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Apr;77(2):216-8. (PMID: 2720224)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Jan;78(1):45-8. (PMID: 2295012)
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Oct;68(4):357-66. (PMID: 7437589)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 19961001 Date Completed: 19970212 Latest Revision: 20181130
Update Code:
20250114
PubMed Central ID:
PMC226183
PMID:
8913547
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Journal use studies provide meaningful data to consider in shaping a library's journal collection. The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library undertook such a study of 2,552 print subscription titles over one year, gathering data on circulation, in-house use, and interlibrary loan (ILL) use. Objectives focused on gathering practical data to support cancellation decisions and to determine whether reliable relationships of in-house to checkout use would emerge, upon which to base future decisions. Data were analyzed for all titles, for titles grouped by publication frequency, and for titles grouped by ten major subject headings. Results, to be interpreted within the limitations of this study and of use studies in general, showed in-house use to be higher than checkouts across all subjects and all publication frequencies-but in ratios too complex to be reduced to a single regression line. All use increases with increases in titles' frequency of publication. Even titles with few or no checkouts show some in-house use. Patterns of serial use differ among general subject disciplines.