Treffer: A Comparative Study of BFV and CKKs Schemes to Secure IoT Data Using TenSeal and Pyfhel Homomorphic Encryption Libraries.

Title:
A Comparative Study of BFV and CKKs Schemes to Secure IoT Data Using TenSeal and Pyfhel Homomorphic Encryption Libraries.
Source:
International Journal of Smart Security Technologies (IJSST); Jan2024, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p1-17, 17p
Database:
Complementary Index

Weitere Informationen

Internet of things (IoT) devices and applications are on the rise, generating large amounts of sensitive and confidential data that need to be processed securely. Due to resource constraints, the data generated is often stored and processed in the cloud. The drawback of data cloud storage and processing is the fact that it can be hacked, leaked, or sold by cloud companies. Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) allows computation on encrypted data using basic mathematical operations and has recently been successfully implemented using schemes and libraries with better performance. In this paper, the authors propose a mixture of edge-cloud-based security schemes using FHE to secure IoT data. The authors evaluate the performance of two FHE schemes (BFV and CKKS) based on data: encoding speed, encryption speed, arithmetic operations (addition and multiplication) speed, and decryption decoding speed using two Python libraries (TenSEAL and PyFHEl). The encryption and decryption are done at the edge node using a Raspberry Pi 4, while the processing is done at the cloud node using a laptop. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Smart Security Technologies (IJSST) is the property of IGI Global, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)