Treffer: Beyond indices: Profiles of social vulnerability for flood risk reduction

Title:
Beyond indices: Profiles of social vulnerability for flood risk reduction
Contributors:
Rufat, Samuel, University of Iowa Iowa City, Princeton University, Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST), Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information Bruz (ENSAI)-École polytechnique (X), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique (ENSAE Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Publisher Information:
CCSD, 2025.
Publication Year:
2025
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Article
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105250
Rights:
CC BY
Accession Number:
edsair.dedup.wf.002..f48e70b0d6d829f257eaf0adb173a1ca
Database:
OpenAIRE

Weitere Informationen

Social vulnerability indices are increasingly employed as policy and planning instruments for disaster risk reduction. Although indices model the magnitude and spatial distribution of vulnerability, they are coarse and often misleading tools for revealing who is most vulnerable, due to uncertainty and information loss during aggregation. The mismatch inhibits the capacity to reveal intersectional vulnerability drivers and tailor risk reduction interventions. This study seeks to identify the major archetypes of compound social vulnerability in the context of flood exposure in the United States. Based on spatial inputs of demographic variables, pluvial and fluvial flood extent, and high-resolution building footprints, we used Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components to classify, map, and analyze social vulnerability profiles. Six distinct profiles emerged from the analysis, two of which describe the confluence of high levels of both social vulnerability characteristics and flood exposure. The first profile is characterized by linguistic isolation, Hispanic populations, low educational attainment, high population density, and lack of health insurance, while the second is distinguished by a cluster of Black populations, low vehicle access, poverty, and female-headed households. The profile configurations span levels of social vulnerability and flood exposure, revealing intersectional complexity obscured by aggregate index scores. We conclude by discussing how profile typologies and their geographies advance understanding of social vulnerability and can inform strategies for equitable flood adaptation.