Treffer: On the inversion number of oriented graphs

Title:
On the inversion number of oriented graphs
Source:
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, Vol vol. 23 no. 2, special issue..., Iss Special issues (2022)
Publication Status:
Preprint
Publisher Information:
Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe (CCSD), 2022.
Publication Year:
2022
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Article<br />Other literature type
File Description:
application/pdf
Language:
English
ISSN:
1365-8050
DOI:
10.46298/dmtcs.7474
DOI:
10.60692/gt1nd-cjy52
DOI:
10.60692/25zjm-b6p30
DOI:
10.48550/arxiv.2105.04137
Rights:
CC BY NC SA
Accession Number:
edsair.doi.dedup.....4c988fa7fc7b8d41e7c981aad5e538ba
Database:
OpenAIRE

Weitere Informationen

Let $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $\tau(D)$, $\tau' (D)$, and $\nu(D)$ the cycle transversal number, the cycle arc-transversal number and the cycle packing number of $D$ respectively, one shows that ${\rm inv}(D) \leq \tau' (D)$, ${\rm inv}(D) \leq 2\tau(D)$ and there exists a function $g$ such that ${\rm inv}(D)\leq g(\nu(D))$. We conjecture that for any two oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, ${\rm inv}(L\rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) +{\rm inv}(R)$ where $L\rightarrow R$ is the dijoin of $L$ and $R$. This would imply that the first two inequalities are tight. We prove this conjecture when ${\rm inv}(L)\leq 1$ and ${\rm inv}(R)\leq 2$ and when ${\rm inv}(L) ={\rm inv}(R)=2$ and $L$ and $R$ are strongly connected. We also show that the function $g$ of the third inequality satisfies $g(1)\leq 4$. We then consider the complexity of deciding whether ${\rm inv}(D)\leq k$ for a given oriented graph $D$. We show that it is NP-complete for $k=1$, which together with the above conjecture would imply that it is NP-complete for every $k$. This contrasts with a result of Belkhechine et al. which states that deciding whether ${\rm inv}(T)\leq k$ for a given tournament $T$ is polynomial-time solvable.