Treffer: Fast quantum algorithms for handling probabilistic and interval uncertainty

Title:
Fast quantum algorithms for handling probabilistic and interval uncertainty
Source:
Mathematical Logic Quarterly. 50:405-416
Publisher Information:
Wiley, 2004.
Publication Year:
2004
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Article
File Description:
application/xml; application/pdf
Language:
English
ISSN:
1521-3870
0942-5616
DOI:
10.1002/malq.200310116
Rights:
Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Accession Number:
edsair.doi.dedup.....a6f5f12e90e1a69426a2d3fade88aedb
Database:
OpenAIRE

Weitere Informationen

In many real‐life situations, we are interested in the value of a physical quantity y that is difficult or impossible to measure directly. To estimate y, we find some easier‐to‐measure quantities x1, … , xn which are related to y by a known relation y = f(x1, … , xn). Measurements are never 100% accurate; hence, the measured values $ \tilde {x} _{i} $ are different from xi, and the resulting estimate $ \tilde {y} = f( \tilde {x} _{1} \ldots , \tilde {x} _{n}) $ is different from the desired value y = f(x1, … , xn). How different can it be? Traditional engineering approach to error estimation in data processing assumes that we know the probabilities of different measurement errors $ \Delta x_i {\mathop {=} \limits ^{\rm def}} \tilde x _i - x_i $. In many practical situations, we only know the upper bound Δi for this error; hence, after the measurement, the only information that we have about xi is that it belongs to the interval $ {\bf x}_i {\mathop {=} \limits ^{\rm def}} [ \tilde x _i - \Delta _i, \tilde x_i + \Delta _i] $. In this case, it is important to find the range y of all possible values of y = f(x1, … , xn) when xi ∈ xi. We start the paper with a brief overview of the computational complexity of the corresponding interval computation problems: Most of the related problems turn out to be, in general, at least NP‐hard. In this paper, we show how the use of quantum computing can speed up some computations related to interval and probabilistic uncertainty. We end the paper with speculations on whether (and how) “hypothetic” physical devices can compute NP‐hard problems faster than in exponential time. Most of the paper's results were first presented at NAFIPS'2003 [30]. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)