Treffer: Analogical proportions: From equality to inequality

Title:
Analogical proportions: From equality to inequality
Contributors:
Quantum Computation & Intelligent Systems Ultimo (UTS:QCIS), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Argumentation, Décision, Raisonnement, Incertitude et Apprentissage (IRIT-ADRIA), Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse (IRIT), Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Toulouse Mind & Brain Institut (TMBI), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source:
ISSN: 0888-613X ; International Journal of Approximate Reasoning ; https://hal.science/hal-02382716 ; International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2018, 101, pp.234-254. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2018.07.005⟩.
Publisher Information:
CCSD
Elsevier
Publication Year:
2018
Collection:
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier: HAL-UPS
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift article in journal/newspaper
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijar.2018.07.005
Rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number:
edsbas.224E4DDB
Database:
BASE

Weitere Informationen

International audience ; Analogical proportions are statements of the form a is to b as c is to d. Such expressions compare the pair (a,b)with the pair (c,d). Previous papers have developed logical modelings of such proportions both in Boolean and in multiple-valued settings. They emphasize a reading of the proportion as “the way a and b differ is the same as c and d differ”. The ambition of this paper is twofold. The paper first provides a deeper understanding and further justifications of the Boolean modeling, before introducing analogical inequalities, where “as” is replaced by “as much as” in the comparison of two pairs. From an abstract viewpoint, analogical proportions are supposed to obey at least three postulates expressing reflexivity, symmetry, and stability under central permutation. Nevertheless these postulates are not enough to determine a single model and a minimality condition has to be added as shown in this paper. These models are organized in a complete lattice based on set inclusion. This leads us to discuss lower and upper approximations of the minimal model. Apart from being minimal, this model can also be evaluated in terms of Kolmogorov complexity via an expression reflecting the intended meaning of analogy. We show that the six Boolean patterns of the minimal model that make Boolean analogy true minimize this expression. Besides, analogical proportions extend to 4-tuples of Boolean vectors. This enables us to explain why analogical proportions also reads in terms of similarity (rather than difference, i.e., dissimilarity): a and d share the same presence or absence of features as b and c. Moreover, we establish a link between analogical proportion and Hamming distances between components of the proportion. We also emphasize that analogical proportions are pervasive in any comparison of two vectors a and d that implicitly induce the existence of “intermediary” vectors b and c forming together such a proportion. The similarity reading and the dissimilarity reading of a Boolean analogical ...