Treffer: The phantom of technological unemployment

Title:
The phantom of technological unemployment
Source:
Russian Journal of Economics ; 5 ; 1 ; 88-116
Publisher Information:
RUS
Publication Year:
2024
Collection:
SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository
Time:
10900
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift article in journal/newspaper
Language:
unknown
DOI:
10.32609/j.ruje.5.35507
Rights:
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0 ; Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Accession Number:
edsbas.A44B3163
Database:
BASE

Weitere Informationen

Nowadays there are many gloomy prophecies provided by both technologists and economists about the detrimental effects of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution on aggregate employment and its composition. These prophecies imply that in the near future we will face Robocalypse - a massive replacement of people by machines alongside an explosion in joblessness. This paper provides theoretical, empirical and historical evidence that the phenomenon of technological unemployment is a phantom. The most general results can be summarized as follows: in the long run, reduction in labor demand under the impact of new technologies is merely a theoretical possibility that has never before been realized in practice; at the level of individual firms, there is a strong positive relationship between innovations and employment growth; at the sectoral level, technological changes cause a multidirectional employment response, since different industries are at different stages of the life cycle; at the macro level, technological progress acts as a positive or neutral, but not a negative factor; a surge in technological unemployment, even in the short-term, seems a remote prospect since in coming decades the pace of technological change is unlikely to be fast enough by historical standards; the impact of new technologies on labor supply may be a more serious problem than their impact on labor demand; technological changes seem to have a much greater effect on the composition of employment than on its level.