Treffer: Algebraic and semialgebraic proofs : Methods and paradoxes

Title:
Algebraic and semialgebraic proofs : Methods and paradoxes
Source:
ADG 2000 : automated deduction in geometry (Zurich, 25-27 September 2000, revised papers)Lecture notes in computer science. :83-103
Publisher Information:
Berlin: Springer, 2001.
Publication Year:
2001
Physical Description:
print, 30 ref
Original Material:
INIST-CNRS
Document Type:
Konferenz Conference Paper
File Description:
text
Language:
English
Author Affiliations:
Dipartimento di Matematica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy
ISSN:
0302-9743
Rights:
Copyright 2002 INIST-CNRS
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Computer science; theoretical automation; systems

Mathematics
Accession Number:
edscal.14047716
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Weitere Informationen

The aim of the present paper is the following: - Examine critically some features of the usual algebraic proof protocols, in particular the test phase that checks if a theorem is true or not, depending on the existence of a non-degenerate component on which it is true; this form of truth leads to paradoxes, that are analyzed both for real and complex theorems. - Generalize these proof tools to theorems on the real field; the generalization relies on the construction of the real radical, and allows to consider inequalities in the statements. - Describe a tool that can be used to transform an algebraic proof valid for the complex field into a proof valid for the real field. - Describe a protocol, valid for both complex and real theorems, in which a statement is supplemented by an example; this protocol allows us to avoid most of the paradoxes.