Result: The anatomy of a loop : A story of scope and control
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Further Information
Writing loops with tail-recursive function calls is the equivalent of writing them with goto's. Given that loop packages for Lisp-family languages have been around for over 20 years, it is striking that none have had much success in the Scheme world. I suggest the reason is that Scheme forces us to be precise about the scoping of the various variables introduced by our loop forms, something previous attempts to design ambitious loop forms have not managed to do. I present the design of a loop package for Scheme with a well-defined and natural scoping rule, based on a notion of control dominance that generalizes the standard lexical-scope rule of the λ-calculus. The new construct is powerful, clear, modular and extensible. The loop language is defined in terms of an underlying language for expressing control-flow graphs. This language itself has interesting properties as an intermediate representation.