Treffer: Data summary from Second AIAA computational fluid dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop

Title:
Data summary from Second AIAA computational fluid dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop
Source:
Journal of aircraft. 42(5):1165-1178
Publisher Information:
Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005.
Publication Year:
2005
Physical Description:
print, 41 ref
Original Material:
INIST-CNRS
Document Type:
Konferenz Conference Paper
File Description:
text
Language:
English
Author Affiliations:
Cessna Aircraft Company, Wichita, Kansas 67218, United States
The Boeing Company, Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23681, United States
DLR, German Aerospace Center, 38108 Brunswick, Germany
The Boeing Company, Seattle, Washington 98124, United States
ONERA, 92322 Chatillon, France
ISSN:
0021-8669
Rights:
Copyright 2006 INIST-CNRS
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Building. Public works. Transport. Civil engineering

Physics: fluid mechanics
Accession Number:
edscal.17174444
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Weitere Informationen

Results from the Second AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop are summarized. The workshop focused on absolute and configuration delta drag prediction of the DLR, German Aerospace Research Center F6 geometry, which is representative of transport aircraft designed for transonic flight. Both wing-body and wing-body-nacelle-pylon configurations are considered. Comparisons are made using industry relevant test cases that include single-point conditions, drag polars, and drag-rise curves. Drag, lift, and pitching moment predictions from several different Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics codes are presented and compared to experimental data. Solutions on multiblock structured, unstructured, and overset structured grids using a variety of turbulence models are considered. Results of a grid-refinement study and a comparison of tripped transition vs fully turbulent boundary-layer computations are reported.