Result: Agreement in synchronous networks with ubiquitous faults
Institute for Theoretical Informatics, ETH Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Mathematics
Further Information
In this paper we are interested in synchronous distributed systems subject to transient and ubiquitous failures. This includes systems where failures will occur on any communication link, systems where every processor will experience at one time or another send or receive failure, etc., and, following a failure, normal functioning resuming after a finite time. Notice that these cases cannot be handled by the traditional component failure models. The model we use is the communication failure model, also called the transmission failure or dynamic faults or mobile faults model. Using this model, we study the fundamental problem of agreement in synchronous networks of arbitrary topology with ubiquitous faults. We establish bounds on the number of dynamic faults that make any non-trivial form of agreement (even strong majority) impossible; in turn, these bounds express connectivity requirements that must be met to achieve any meaningful form of agreement. We also provide, constructively, bounds on the number of dynamic faults in spite of which any non-trivial form of agreement (even unanimity) is possible. These bounds are shown to be tight for a large class of networks, which includes hypercubes, toruses, rings, and complete graphs; incidentally, we close the existing gap between possibility and impossibility of non-trivial agreement in complete graphs in the presence of dynamic Byzantine faults. None of these results is derivable in the component failure models; in particular, all our possibility results hold in situations for which those models indicate impossibility.