• A comprehensive appropriatenes...

Treffer: A comprehensive appropriateness of prescribing questionnaire was validated by nominal consensus group

Title:
A comprehensive appropriateness of prescribing questionnaire was validated by nominal consensus group
Authors:
HOLBROOK, Anne M, JANJUSEVIC, Vladan, GOLDSMITH, Charlie H, SHCHERBATYKH, Ivan Y, COMPETE Investigators
Source:
Journal of clinical epidemiology. 60(10):1022-1028
Publisher Information:
New York, NY: Elsevier, 2007.
Publication Year:
2007
Physical Description:
print, 34 ref
Original Material:
INIST-CNRS
Subject Terms:
General medicine general surgery, Médecine et chirurgie générales, Sciences biologiques et medicales, Biological and medical sciences, Sciences medicales, Medical sciences, Generalites, General aspects, Sante publique. Hygiene-medecine du travail, Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine, Santé publique. Hygiène, Public health. Hygiene, Généralités, Epidémiologie, Epidemiology, Méthodologie, Methodology, Divers, Miscellaneous, Economie santé, Health economy, Economía salud, Aide décision, Decision aid, Ayuda decisión, Analyse coût efficacité, Cost efficiency analysis, Análisis costo eficacia, Epidémiologie, Epidemiology, Epidemiología, Evaluation, Evaluación, Fiabilité, Reliability, Fiabilidad, Homme, Human, Hombre, Médecine, Medicine, Medicina, Médicament, Drug, Medicamento, Méthodologie, Methodology, Metodología, Politique sanitaire, Health policy, Política sanitaria, Prescription médicale, Medical prescription, Prescripción médica, Questionnaire, Cuestionario, Santé publique, Public health, Salud pública, Traitement informatique, Computerized processing, Tratamiento informático, Validation, Validación, Appropriateness, Computerized drug utilization evaluation, Prescribing
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Article
File Description:
text
Language:
English
Author Affiliations:
Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, 105 Main Street East, P1, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1G6, Canada
Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McMaster University, 105 Main Street East, P1, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1G6, Canada
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 105 Main Street East, P1, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1G6, Canada
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 105 Main Street East, P1, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1G6, Canada
ISSN:
0895-4356
Access URL:
http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=search&terms=19135869
Rights:
Copyright 2007 INIST-CNRS
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Generalities in medical sciences

Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine. Information processing
Accession Number:
edscal.19135869
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Weitere Informationen

Objective: To develop and validate a comprehensive Appropriateness of Prescribing Evaluation Questionnaire (APEQ) suitable for human and computer use. Study Design and Setting: This study was part of an ongoing research program examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computerized prescribing decision support for providers, patients, and drug policy. A nominal group consensus process involved physicians, both primary care physicians and specialists, pharmacists, drug plan managers, patients, patient advocates, and pharmaceutical industry. Structured case scenarios of musculoskeletal problems were used to evaluate APEQ's validity and responsiveness. Results: Seventeen panelists evaluated 72 patient scenarios in two rounds. Their ratings of appropriateness, assessed by ANOVA, showed significant agreement with the experts' scores in the two rounds, which evaluated appropriateness and responsiveness, respectively. Interrater and intrarater agreement was moderate to good. Conclusion: This formal assessment suggests that APEQ has reasonable validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Such tools could be very useful in e-prescribing and e-claims reimbursement environments and should be further explored.