Treffer: When coders are reliable : the application of three measures to assess inter-rater reliability/agreement with doctor - patient communication data coded with the VR - CoDES / Lorsque les outils de codage sont fiables: utilisation de 3 systèmes de mesure afin d'évaluer l'inter/intra fiabilité/adéquation des données de communication médecin-patient codées avec VR - CoDES

Title:
When coders are reliable : the application of three measures to assess inter-rater reliability/agreement with doctor - patient communication data coded with the VR - CoDES / Lorsque les outils de codage sont fiables: utilisation de 3 systèmes de mesure afin d'évaluer l'inter/intra fiabilité/adéquation des données de communication médecin-patient codées avec VR - CoDES
Authors:
FLETCHER, I, MAZZI, M, NUEBLING, M
Source:
Patient education and counseling. 82(3):341-345
Publisher Information:
Oxford: Elsevier, 2011.
Publication Year:
2011
Physical Description:
print, Illustration,
Original Material:
BDSP
Subject Terms:
Hygiene and public health, epidemiology, occupational medicine, Hygiène et santé publique, épidémiologie, médecine du travail, Sciences biologiques et medicales, Biological and medical sciences, Sciences medicales, Medical sciences, Sante publique. Hygiene-medecine du travail, Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine, Santé publique. Hygiène, Public health. Hygiene, Divers, Miscellaneous, Coefficient, Coeficiente, Collecte donnée, Data gathering, Recolección dato, Communication, Comunicación, Donnée statistique, Statistical data, Dato estadístico, Evaluation, Evaluación, Fiabilité, Reliability, Fiabilidad, Relation médecin malade, Physician patient relation, Relación médico paciente, Statistique, Statistics, Estadística, Traitement informatique, Computerized processing, Tratamiento informático
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Article
File Description:
text
Language:
English
ISSN:
0738-3991
Access URL:
http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=search&terms=25927078
Rights:
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine. Information processing
Accession Number:
edscal.25927078
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Weitere Informationen

Objective : To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. Methods : The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with ; Cohen's k, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater kj, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results : Minor differences were found between Cohen's k and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin=0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. kj (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates. Conclusion : It is more practical to analyse nominal data with>2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's k or an ICC. Practice implication : Alternatives to Cohen's k are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients. [résumé éditeur].