Treffer: The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations

Title:
The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations
Authors:
AMOS, Kathleen A
Source:
Journal of the Medical Library Association. 102(2):87-91
Publisher Information:
Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association, 2014.
Publication Year:
2014
Physical Description:
print, 26 ref
Original Material:
INIST-CNRS
Subject Terms:
Documentation, Sciences exactes et technologie, Exact sciences and technology, Sciences et techniques communes, Sciences and techniques of general use, Sciences de l'information. Documentation, Information science. Documentation, Sciences de l'information et des bibliothèques. Etude d'ensemble, Library and information science. General aspects, Etudes d'utilisateurs et d'utilisation. Besoins d'information, Use and user studies. Information needs, Sciences de l'information et de la communication, Information and communication sciences, Document publié, Published document, Documento publicado, Ethique, Ethics, Etica, Plagiat, Plagiarism, Plagio, Revue savante, Scholarly journal
Document Type:
Konferenz Conference Paper
File Description:
text
Language:
English
Author Affiliations:
Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice, Public Health Foundation, 1300 L Street Northwest, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005, United States
ISSN:
1536-5050
Access URL:
http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=search&terms=28479370
Rights:
Copyright 2015 INIST-CNRS
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Sciences of information and communication. Documentation

FRANCIS
Accession Number:
edscal.28479370
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Weitere Informationen

This study explored national differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication in retracted biomedical literature. The national affiliations of authors and reasons for retraction of papers accessible through PubMed that were published from 2008 to 2012 and subsequently retracted were determined in order to identify countries with the largest numbers and highest rates of retraction due to plagiarism and duplicate publication. Authors from more than fifty countries retracted papers. While the United States retracted the most papers, China retracted the most papers for plagiarism and duplicate publication. Rates of plagiarism and duplicate publication were highest in Italy and Finland, respectively. Unethical publishing practices cut across nations.