Service restrictions from February 12-22, 2026—more information on the University Library website

Result: Parallel vs. Sequential Cascading MEP Coordination Strategies: A Pharmaceutical Building Case Study

Title:
Parallel vs. Sequential Cascading MEP Coordination Strategies: A Pharmaceutical Building Case Study
Source:
Automation in construction. 43:170-179
Publisher Information:
Kidlington: Elsevier, 2014.
Publication Year:
2014
Physical Description:
print, 40 ref
Original Material:
INIST-CNRS
Subject Terms:
Control theory, operational research, Automatique, recherche opérationnelle, Civil engineering, Génie civil, Sciences exactes et technologie, Exact sciences and technology, Sciences appliquees, Applied sciences, Batiment. Travaux publics, Buildings. Public works, Généralités, General, Etablissement de projets. Techniques de conception, Project management. Process of design, Calcul des constructions. Sollicitations, Structural analysis. Stresses, Méthodes de calcul. Tables. Abaques, Computation methods. Tables. Charts, Bâtiment, Buildings, Types de bâtiment, Types of buildings, Bâtiment commercial, Commercial building, Analyse donnée, Data analysis, Análisis datos, Analyse qualitative, Qualitative analysis, Análisis cualitativo, Analyse séquentielle, Sequential analysis, Análisis secuencial, Architecture, Arquitectura, Bâtiment bureau, Office building, Edificio oficina, Calcul parallèle, Parallel computation, Cálculo paralelo, Communication information, Information communication, Comunicación información, Conception, Design, Diseño, Equipement bâtiment, Building equipment, Equipo edificio, Etude cas, Case study, Estudio caso, Evaluation projet, Project evaluation, Evaluación proyecto, Industrie pharmaceutique, Pharmaceutical industry, Industria farmacéutica, Modélisation, Modeling, Modelización, Stratégie, Strategy, Estrategia, Structure construction, Construction structure, Estructura construcción, Modélisation des données du bâtiment, Building information modeling, Modelado de información de construcción, Building information modeling (BIM), Design coordination, Information sharing, Parallel process, Productivity, Sequential cascading process
Document Type:
Academic journal Article
File Description:
text
Language:
English
Author Affiliations:
Department of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-749, Korea, Republic of
DPR Construction, 2941 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 600, Falls Church, 22042 VA, United States
ISSN:
0926-5805
Rights:
Copyright 2015 INIST-CNRS
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Building. Public works. Transport. Civil engineering
Accession Number:
edscal.28547471
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Further Information

We analyze the impact of parallel vs. sequential design coordination strategies on coordination productivity and information sharing. Previous studies have shown how building information modeling (BIM) could improve interorganizational design coordination between architecture, structure, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) components of buildings (MEP coordination, for short) and thus improve the quality and efficiency of a design and construction project in terms of the reduced numbers of errors and requests for information. This paper presents a unique case where two MEP coordinators were hired for a BIM-assisted project, which was a pharmaceutical company headquarters office building in Silver Spring, Maryland. The first coordinator coordinated MEP designs concurrently with other trades, whereas the second coordinator coordinated MEP designs step-by-step in a sequential process. The results of our analysis showed that the two different coordination processes largely affect the number of clashes in the first run of clash detection, coordination meeting time and efficiency, ease in finding root causes of the clashes, and number of coordination cycles to complete the coordination. As such, the sequential coordination strategy was about three times faster than the parallel strategy in terms of coordination productivity. A further examination of these two processes from an information-sharing perspective showed that the sequential coordination process reduces the concentration of information, thus reducing the overload of a coordinator with decision-making tasks, and facilitates information sharing between heterogeneous project participants. The findings of this study have potential as a basis for future development of BIM-based MEP coordination best practices and strategies as well as providing the metrics for understanding, measuring, and predicting the performance of BIM-based MEP coordination and strategically planning the coordination process.