Result: In a world of Amazon, is it time to rethink ILL?
University of Washington Libraries, Seattle, Washington, United States
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
FRANCIS
Further Information
Purpose - This paper aims to evaluate the use of alternative methods compared to traditional interlibrary loan (ILL) processes. Design/methodology/approach - ILL departments around the world were surveyed about their policies and procedures for obtaining materials for their users. Findings - The survey results indicated that alternative methods are predominantly a fringe activity, while most materials are still obtained through traditional ILL processes. There continues to be a great deal of room for exploration of purchasing, renting and the use of free resources to fill ILL requests. Originality/value - This article shows that there continues to be a great deal of room for exploration of purchasing, renting and the use of free resources to fill ILL requests.