Serviceeinschränkungen vom 12.-22.02.2026 - weitere Infos auf der UB-Homepage

Treffer: The Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-4), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 1-3, 1995

Title:
The Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-4), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 1-3, 1995
Source:
NIST special publication. (500236)
Publisher Information:
Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1996.
Publication Year:
1996
Physical Description:
print, dissem
Original Material:
INIST-CNRS
Document Type:
Konferenz Conference Proceedings
File Description:
text
Language:
English
Author Affiliations:
Computer Systems Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001, United States
ISSN:
1048-776X
Rights:
Copyright 1997 INIST-CNRS
CC BY 4.0
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Notes:
Sciences of information and communication. Documentation

FRANCIS
Accession Number:
edscal.483704
Database:
PASCAL Archive

Weitere Informationen

This report constitutes the proceedings of the fourth Text REtrival Conference (TREC-4) held in Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 1-3, 1995. The conference was co-sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and was attended by 140 people involved in the 36 participating groups. The goal of the conference was to bring research groups together to discuss their work on large test collection. There was a wide variation of retrieval techniques reported on, including methods using automatic thesaurii, sophisticated term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback, and advanced pattern matching. As results had been run through a common evaluation package, groups were able to compare the effectiveness of different techniques, and discuss how differences between the systems affected performance. In addition to the main evaluation, 5 more focussed evaluations, called tracks were run. The conference included paper sessions and discussion group. This proceedings includes paper from most of the participants (several poster groups did not submit papers), tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information.