Treffer: Answer to the CDC: Validation Must Precede Promotion

Title:
Answer to the CDC: Validation Must Precede Promotion
Contributors:
Institut universitaire de France (IUF), Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche (M.E.N.E.S.R.), CY Cergy Paris Université (CY), University of Iowa [Iowa City], University of Central Florida [Orlando] (UCF), Department of Geography, University of Iowa, European Project: NSF 1333190,U.S. National Science Foundation 1333190, European Project: NSF 1707947,U.S. National Science Foundation 1707947, European Project: 1333190(2013)
Source:
Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 111(4)
Publisher Information:
CCSD; Taylor & Francis, 2020.
Publication Year:
2020
Collection:
collection:SHS
collection:UNIV-CERGY
collection:AO-GEOGRAPHIE
collection:GIP-BE
Original Identifier:
HAL: hal-03146337
Document Type:
Zeitschrift article<br />Journal articles
Language:
English
ISSN:
2469-4452
2469-4460
Relation:
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/24694452.2020.1857221; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//NSF 1333190/EU/Measuring social equity in flood recovery funding/U.S. National Science Foundation 1333190; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//NSF 1707947/EU/Humans, Disasters, and the Built Environment program/U.S. National Science Foundation 1707947; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//1333190/EU/Collaborative Research: Measuring Social Vulnerability - Reducing Uncertainty and Validating Indicators
DOI:
10.1080/24694452.2020.1857221
Rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number:
edshal.hal.03146337v1
Database:
HAL

Weitere Informationen

We would like to thank the CDC colleagues for their Commentary in what constitutes the first comment on a paper published in the Annals in decades. We view critique as a strength of scientific exploration. The Commentary concludes with as statement agreeing with the findings and conclusions of our paper: “we recognize CDC SVI may not identify the most vulnerable populations in all applications and has not done so in the Rufat et al. study (…) we agree with the authors.”