Result: On the usage of pythonic idioms

Title:
On the usage of pythonic idioms
Publisher Information:
ACM 2019-07-01T12:00:30Z 2019-07-01T12:00:30Z 2018
Document Type:
Electronic Resource Electronic Resource
Availability:
Open access content. Open access content
Licence according to publishing contract
Note:
Onward! 2018 : Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software
English
Other Numbers:
CHZHA oai:digitalcollection.zhaw.ch:11475/17381
https://doi.org/10.1145/3276954.3276960
info:doi/10.1145/3276954.3276960
https://hdl.handle.net/11475/17381
https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/17381
info:hdl/11475/17381
urn:isbn:978-1-4503-6031-9
1109723861
Contributing Source:
ZHAW UNIV LIBR
From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
Accession Number:
edsoai.on1109723861
Database:
OAIster

Further Information

Developers discuss software architecture and concrete source code implementations on a regular basis, be it on question-answering sites, online chats, mailing lists or face to face. In many cases, there is more than one way of solving a programming task. Which way is best may be decided based on case-specific circumstances and constraints, but also based on convention. Having strong conventions, and a common vocabulary to express them, simplifies communication and strengthens common understanding of software development problems and their solutions. While many programming ecosystems have a common vocabulary, Python’s relationship to conventions and common language is a particularly pronounced. The “Zen of Python”, a famous set of high-level coding conventions authored by Tim Peters, states “There should be one, and preferably only one, obvious way to do it”. This ‘one way to do it’ is often referred to as the ‘Pythonic’ way: the ideal solution to a particular problem. Few other programming languages have coined a unique term to label the quality of craftsmanship gone into a software artifact. In this paper, we explore how Python developers understand the term ‘Pythonic’ by means of structured interviews, build a catalogue of ‘pythonic idioms’ gathered from literature, and conjecture on the effects of having a language-specific term for quality code, considering the potential it could hold for other programming languages and ecosystems. We find that while the term means different things to novice versus experienced Python developers, it encompasses not only concrete implementation, but a way of thinking - a culture - in general.