Treffer: Impacts of Academic Recovery Interventions on Student Achievement in 2022-23. Working Paper No. 303-0724

Title:
Impacts of Academic Recovery Interventions on Student Achievement in 2022-23. Working Paper No. 303-0724
Language:
English
Source:
National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER). 2024.
Availability:
National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. American Institutes for Research, 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Washington, DC 20007. Tel: 202-403-5796; Fax: 202-403-6783; e-mail: info@caldercenter.org; Web site: https://caldercenter.org
Peer Reviewed:
N
Page Count:
55
Publication Date:
2024
Document Type:
Report Reports - Research<br />Numerical/Quantitative Data
Education Level:
Elementary Secondary Education
Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers:
Entry Date:
2024
Accession Number:
ED662872
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

The COVID-19 pandemic devastated student achievement, with declines rivaling those after Hurricane Katrina. These losses widened achievement gaps between historically marginalized students and their peers. Three years later, achievement remains behind pre-pandemic levels for many students. This paper examines 2022-23 academic recovery efforts across eight districts, including tutoring, small group instruction, after-school, extended year, double-dose, digital learning, and expert teacher interventions. Across 22 math and reading interventions, most were delivered to fewer students and for less time than planned. We find positive effects for one tutoring program on math scores and two tutoring programs on reading scores, ranging from 0.22 to 0.33 SD. Each of these programs served a very small share of the district's students and was unlikely to play a major role in district-wide academic recovery. Finally, we find that having an "expert" teacher with high evaluation scores as opposed to a non-expert teacher significantly improves student achievement by 0.06 SD in math and 0.11 SD in reading. While highlighting the promise of intensive academic interventions, our findings underscore the challenges districts face in scaling such interventions to match their recovery needs. The field needs better evidence regarding successful implementation of large-scale interventions.

As Provided