Treffer: A Model-Based Approach to Predicting Graduate-Level Performance Using Indicators of Undergraduate-Level Performance

Title:
A Model-Based Approach to Predicting Graduate-Level Performance Using Indicators of Undergraduate-Level Performance
Language:
English
Source:
Journal of Educational Data Mining. 2015 7(3):151-176.
Availability:
International Educational Data Mining. e-mail: jedm.editor@gmail.com; Web site: http://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
26
Publication Date:
2015
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Education Level:
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Geographic Terms:
ISSN:
2157-2100
Entry Date:
2015
Accession Number:
EJ1115318
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

The graduate admissions process is crucial for controlling the quality of higher education, yet, rules-of-thumb and domain-specific experiences often dominate evidence-based approaches. The goal of the present study is to dissect the predictive power of undergraduate performance indicators and their aggregates. We analyze 81 variables in 171 student records from a Bachelor's and a Master's program in Computer Science and employ state-of-the-art methods suitable for high-dimensional data-settings. We consider regression models in combination with variable selection and variable aggregation embedded in a double-layered cross-validation loop. Moreover, bootstrapping is employed to identify the importance of explanatory variables. Critically, the data is not confounded by an admission-induced selection bias, which allows us to obtain an unbiased estimate of the predictive value of undergraduate-level indicators for subsequent performance at the graduate level. Our results show that undergraduate-level performance can explain 54% of the variance in graduate-level performance. Significantly, we unexpectedly identified the third-year grade point average as the most significant explanatory variable, whose influence exceeds the one of grades earned in challenging first-year courses. Analyzing the structure of the undergraduate program shows that it primarily assesses a single set of student abilities. Finally, our results provide a methodological basis for deriving principled guidelines for admissions committees.

As Provided