Serviceeinschränkungen vom 12.-22.02.2026 - weitere Infos auf der UB-Homepage

Treffer: Principals' Intergenerational Knowledge-Sharing Practices in a Professional Learning Community: A Case of a South African Education Circuit

Title:
Principals' Intergenerational Knowledge-Sharing Practices in a Professional Learning Community: A Case of a South African Education Circuit
Language:
English
Authors:
Bongani Nkambule (ORCID 0000-0001-9022-0960), Bongi Mashiane-Nkabinde (ORCID 0000-0002-7426-3327)
Source:
Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education. 2025 16(1):57-76.
Availability:
Sciendo, a company of De Gruyter Poland. 32 Zuga Street, 01-811 Warsaw, Poland. Tel: +48-22-701-5015; e-mail: info@sciendo.com; Web site: https://www.sciendo.com
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
20
Publication Date:
2025
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Geographic Terms:
DOI:
10.2478/dcse-2025-0006
ISSN:
2255-7547
2255-7547
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1469099
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

The kernel of this paper was to investigate the state of intergenerational knowledge-sharing practices in a principals' professional learning community (PLC) at a selected South African education circuit. The paper was nested in a qualitative approach and the interpretivist paradigm. Deliberate and snowball sampling techniques were employed to draw out eight participants of different generational orientations, namely the Boomers II (1955-1964), Generation X (1965-1980) and Millennials (1981-1996) whose subjective voices moulded the findings of the paper. Wenger's (1998) communities of practice (CoP) theory was used as a theoretical backbone for the paper. The final outlook of the thematic analysis demonstrated that intergenerational knowledge-sharing practices entrenched an asset-based mindset in a PLC and resulted in knowledge transfer, bridging of skills gaps, and elimination of misconceptions among members. It enabled members to meaningfully and jointly brainstorm strategies to address challenges that affect their leadership role. In addition, the finding revealed that the bondage among members invoked a sense of codependence in them, in terms of which those from adequately resourced schools shared their resources with those from under-resourced schools. Another finding exposed minor (but costly) barriers to the optimal functionality of intergenerational relations caused by code-switching between English and vernacular (Indigenous) languages, which diminished non-vernacular language speakers' absorption of information. The second barrier, as expressed by the youngest members of the PLC (i.e., Millennials), was caused by overreliance on the older members' (i.e., the Boomers II and Generation X) expert power to resolve decision-making stalemates, resulting in non-distributive decision-making. The paper recommended that code-switching be minimised to enable all members to participate in knowledge sharing on an equal basis. Older members of the PLC are encouraged to view the inclusion of younger members in key decision-making processes as a vital strategy to uphold the integrity and sustainability of intergenerational dialogue, collective social responsibility, and effective problem-solving.

As Provided